Thursday, March 31, 2011

Essay 4 Outline


Thesis: Lowering the drinking age in America from 21 to 18 will allow teenagers to become more responsible around alcohol being that they will be able to legally drink while typically still living in their parents households.

INTRO – The drinking age was set at 21 in 1984. “Raising the drinking age to 21 was passed with the very best of intentions, but it’s had the very worst of outcomes,” said David J. Hanson. THESIS. Transition into ¶ 1.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20249460/ns/health-addictions/

It is probable that it will take time to let the new drinking age settle down, but in the long-run, drinking will not be such an exciting thrill for teenagers.

-       Teens will be over excited in the beginning that they are allowed to drink.  But over a time period, learning about being a responsible drinker will be sure to come.

-       Parents will be sure to expose their children to alcohol in proper ways and let them learn about the effects. VS, kids drinking on their own, with little knowledge of the consequences, usually learning the hard way.

-       Alex Johnson, MSNBC Reporter- “The age restriction does not work, they say. Drinking has gone on behind closed doors and underground, where responsible adults cannot keep an eye on it.”  [ < elaborate ] http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20249460/ns/health-addictions/


Can go to war, but cannot drink a beer argument.

-       18 year olds are going to fight in wars and battle for their countries, but
can’t drink a beer or two.


CONLUDE – In 1984, the new drinking age of 21 was a good idea. But overtime we have seen teens take drinking the wrong way. Drinking for the thrill of not being able to. They do not drink to have headaches the next morning. They think it is fun to abuse. Lowering the drinking age to 18 would prevent alcohol abuse and allow teenagers to learn to use it responsibly. 

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Proposal Blog

As Michael Benson clearly explains in his article "Send It Somewhere Special", the International Space Station is not really doing anything. By anything, he and I mean, it is simply orbiting Earth wasting extreme amounts of money to support it. Similar to Benson's logic, I propose all nations interested in doing research through the ISS come together to afford a drive system to move it to Mars, since we have not yet been there, because it is truly expensive and we are not learning much from it. With many nations helping and working together, we can all learn about space and future living environments. This will also build international team work and unity. Like Benson said, it will not be too challenging for it is already in space and simply needs technical work. The future in space can be much more in sight if we can do this.

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Evaluating the credibility of a source I’ve selected for third essay

I did some internet researching for racial profiling and saw some controversy over the meaning. A news website, mercurynews.com posted an article titled: San Jose police change definition of 'Racial Profiling'. A news website typically offers credible information so this is a useful source. The article was posted February 21, 2011 so it is current information. The article mentions there have been a number of racial profiling allegations in recent years. The subject is the department is broadening the definition of the term. The new perspective of racial profiling in San Jose appears to be "any biased behavior at any time during an encounter with the public". Originally is was a violation only if an officer stopped someone due to race, now is strictly any behavior.

http://www.mercurynews.com/crime-courts/ci_17445138?nclick_check=1
Sean Webby 2/21/2011